ACC-06 · FlowCount Assure
TB to financial statements
Draft statements, lead schedules and analytical review from a trial balance.
من ميزان المراجعة إلى القوائم المالية
Two scores
mapping confidence and analytical risk, never blended
Basis: property of the method
The problem
Every period the TB is remapped to the statements in a spreadsheet, the lead schedules are rebuilt and the variance commentary is written from scratch.
What FlowCount does
Map a standardised TB to the balance sheet, P&L and cash flow; produce lead schedules, comparatives and note support; and flag relationships worth a question, such as receivables growing well ahead of revenue.
- AI and rules used
- LLM account mapping; grounded narrative
- Builds on
- GL ↔ TB ↔ FS integrity check
How it works
Who does each step
- 01AI
Propose the mapping
Each account to an FS line, with confidence. Reviewed on first use, remembered after.
- 02Rules
Build the statements
Lead schedules, comparatives and period movements.
- 03AI
Draft commentary
Grounded only in computed movements.
- 04Reviewer
Approve
Mapping changes and narrative approved before external use.
What you send
- TB
- Chart-of-accounts mapping
- Comparative TB and FS
- Reporting template
What you receive
- Draft financial statements
- Lead schedules
- Mapping exceptions
- Analytical review commentary
Controls built in
- Mapping confidence and analytical-risk confidence reported separately: a correctly mapped account can still move unusually
- Tier-3 drafting controls on commentary
Portfolio scorecard
Where it sits on the roadmap
Value
3.50 / 5
Feasibility
3.40 / 5
Priority index
3.97 · rank 17 of 27
Quadrant
Strategic bet
Delivery
Wave 3 (6-12 m)
T-shirt size M: 4 to 8 weeks with 2 engineers + 1 tax SME + 0.25 QA, indicative build 120k to 275k. New data source or document type + rules + review-UI changes. How we score and sequence →
Draft statements, lead schedules and analytical review from a trial balance.
Tell us about your situation and we will keep you posted as this solution moves forward.